Go Back   Music-Web Forums > General > Music
Register FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 22-06-2007, 10:35 AM
reith's Avatar
reith (Offline)
Moderator
Music-Web Supporter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: England
Posts: 903
reith is an unknown quantity at this point
Preserving "classical" music

The recording and dissemination of classical music has always concerned me because output from the "majors" in the 90s seemed to be diminishing fast. On the rarest occasions, EMI, Polygram, BMG came up with new music. The music-listening world, obsessed with Beethoven and Mozart seemed happy to rest on the several hundred recordings each of the famous works (not forgetting the 900 available versions of the Four Seasons).

Were there enough of us to support the few independent and usually small labels who were purveying anything from ancient music on authentic instruments to new music, some on instruments unimagined last week!

It looks like things are flourishing. Looking through the release list in "International Record Review", the market seems dominated by an increasing number of small labels. Output from the big guys is minimal. So at least they've left the field open for enterprising and hard-working producers on small labels that are usually far more focussed.

Some of these labels are barely more than hobbies for their owners!

Anyway, a talking point. Since most music is disseminated via the media these days it should be of concern to every aspiring composer/performer. Behind all this somewhere, though, is still an amount of live music as witnessed by composers on the Society for the Promotion of New Music site.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-06-2007, 02:23 PM
Violoncello's Avatar
Violoncello (Offline)
Music Admirer
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 22
Violoncello is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Preserving "classical" music

I understand what you mean. The success of composers depends a lot on the exposure they get and this is caught up with fashion. I have heard that the BBC once - a decade ago - refused to look at anything tonal. The music companies nowadays favour the buyer more than the seller so they push what they think they'll sell.

But I still think that the fashion itself appears because the music buying public are looking for something, maybe something new or something they already know a bit about, and it sticks.

So bravo for these small indies. They provide for the tiny minority. The big labels will perpetuate whatever they can sell. That's why the earlier classical and romantic composers get preserved. The music sells.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Preserving "classical" music
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Agony" Vocalise for Soprano sezen Solo/Duo Works 9 18-03-2007 08:45 PM
"Music" main page Sheba Queen The Music-Web Encyclopedia Project 1 04-09-2006 10:27 PM
did you ever done a "psicofisiology of the musical execution" stage? lauramail2005 Music 5 13-08-2006 03:25 PM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
SEO by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
©2006-2007 Music-Web.org. All Rights Reserved. Content published on Music-Web requires permission for reprint.